SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
INDERMEET KAUR
Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Hansalya Properties Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Indermeet Kaur, J. (Oral)

1. The order impugned before this court is the order dated 09.04.2008 vide which on a preliminary issue taken up by the Trial Court, the plaintiff had been directed to pay up the ad-valorem court fee on the amount of sale consideration of Rs.24,32,950/-. Plaintiff/petitioner is aggrieved by this finding.

2. Record shows that the present petitioner had filed a suit for perpetual, mandatory injunction and damages. Plaintiff is a company registered under the Companies Act; defendant No. 1 is a partnership firm comprising of defendant Nos. 2 to 4. In 1970, the father of the defendant No. 2 holding himself out as the owner of property bearing No. 15, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi and in his capacity as a partner of Hansalaya Properties Ltd. had made a multi storied building on the aforenoted premises comprising of floors/flats; undertaking was that each flat would consist of individual flats and purchase would be on ownership basis carrying all rights which are necessary for a complete and proper utilization and enjoyment of the said floors/flats. Negotiations between the plaintiff and the defendants ensued; letter dated 30.09.1970 as also another com

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top