SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
S.RAVINDRA BHAT, S.P.GARG
Amar – Appellant
Versus
State (Delhi Admn.) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.P.Garg, J.

1. The appellants Kishan and Amar have preferred the present appeal against the judgment dated 02.09.1997 and the order on sentence dated 04.09.1997 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Session Case No.65/1996 by which they were convicted for committing offences punishable under Section 302/34 IPC. The appellant Kishan was in addition convicted for the offence punishable under Section 27 Arms Act. They were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.500/- each for committing offences punishable under Section 302/34 IPC. Kishan was further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.250/- for committing offence under Section 27 Arms Act. Both the sentences were ordered to operate concurrently.

2. Criminal law was set into motion at around 10:30 P.M on 20.05.1993 when Daily Diary No.24 (Ex.PW11/A) was recorded by Ct.Balender Singh at the police post Gambri, PS Bhajanpura, on getting an information from Const.Renu that one Kapil had been stabbed with a churi near the house of one Atul Rehman, Gali No.3, Gautam Vihar.

3. Investigation was assigned to ASI Ram Kirpal who with Ct.Manbir reached the s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top