SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
G.P.MITTAL
Shainda – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Kumar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

G. P. Mittal, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 21730/2011 (delay)

1. There is a delay of 44 days in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the Delay is condoned and the application is allowed.

MAC APP. 1077/2011

2. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of Rs.10,04,900/- awarded to the Appellant for having suffered injuries in an accident which occurred on 28.10.2007. The Appellant mainly suffered injury to her left eye which according to PW-2 Dr. Jolly Rohtagi, resulted in a disability of above 40% but less than 75%.

3. The Appellant had passed her 10+2 (Secondary School Examination). She wanted to pursue course in Chartered Accountancy (CA). The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in the absence of any evidence with regard to the Appellant's income took the minimum wages of a Matriculate i.e. Rs.3964/- per month, added 50% on account of inflation, took the loss of earning capacity to be 57% to award a compensation of Rs.6,15,420/-. The Claims Tribunal took the Loss of Earning for a period of six months to award a sum of Rs.23,784/- ( 3964/- x 6).

4. The Claims Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards Conveyance Charges,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top