SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Yasmeen Sayed – Appellant
Versus
Central Warehousing Corporation – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Valmiki J. Mehta, J (Oral)

1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the termination order dated 7.6.2012 whereby the services of the petitioner have been terminated by the respondent/employer/Central Warehousing Corporation. The petitioner was a Management Trainee and the termination order was passed as the services of the petitioner have been found not to be satisfactory.

2. On behalf of the petitioner, it is contended that the officers of the respondent did not forward the reports of the petitioner in time. It is further argued that the assessment reports which have been prepared with respect to the petitioner show that two officers have found that the petitioner was fit for independently working as Manager. It is further argued that the assessment reports during the training period shows that the work of the petitioner has always been found to be satisfactory, and therefore, termination order is unjustified in concluding that petitioner's services were unsatisfactory. It is also argued that as per the Final Assessment Report of the petitioner, the petitioner is found to have received 24 out of 40 marks in presentation for 'service tax', and there

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top