SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited – Appellant
Versus
Fujitshu India Private Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), impugns the judgment dated 25.11.2014 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the learned Single Judge had dismissed the objections filed by the appellant under Section 34 of the Act.

2. On 30.06.1998, the appellant-Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL for short) issued the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) for supply of CDMA IS-95A WLL technology. The respondent Fujitshu India Private Limited (FTPL for short) was the successful bidder and Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 01.06.99 was issued in its favour. Three Purchase Orders (hereinafter referred to as PO-I, PO-II and PO-III), over a period of time, were issued in favour of the respondent pursuant to the said tender.

3. Certain disputes arose between the parties with regard to the payments due to the respondents. The appellant-MTNL formed a Committee to deal with the issues that were pending between the parties. The Committee made recommendations to the Board of Directors of the appellant and also directed release of payment in respect of PO-I, II & III subject to certain dedu






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top