SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VED PRAKASH VAISH
Gurdeep Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. By way of present petition, the petitioner assails order dated 06.04.2015 passed by Assistant Commissioner, Customs Preventive (Alpha Group), New Delhi whereby the consignment of the petitioner was provisionally released subject to execution of bond for re-determined value of the imported goods i.e. Rs.54,48,608/- (Rupees Fifty four lakhs forty eight thousand six hundred eight) supported with cash deposit of differential duty of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten lakhs) and bank guarantee of Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees eight lakhs) with auto renewal clause.

2. Shorn off unnecessary details, the facts of the present case are that vide panchnama dated 11-12.02.2015, the concerned seizing officer seized the consignment of goods imported by the petitioner namely auto motor parts under Bill of Entry No. 8242439 dated 09.02.2015 and MAWB No. 176-7496-6124 bearing an assessable value of Rs.3,18,125.44 under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962, on the allegations that the value and description of those goods were concealed and mis-declared and further that excess goods were found in the consignment. Vide letter dated 03.03.2015 addressed to the Joint Commissioner of Customs (Prev.), the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top