SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, PRATIBHA RANI
Pankaj Kumar Parihar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Pratibha Rani, J. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated June 20, 2003 by the Disciplinary Authority imposing penalty of `Dismissal from Service' as well the order dated September 29, 2003 by the Appellate Authority and the order dated May 06, 2004 by the Revisional Authority dismissing his appeal and revision respectively.

2. The petitioner joined CISF as Constable on March 30, 1996. When he was posted at BSP Unit, Bhilai, for his undesirable activities, he was placed under suspension.

3. During the period of suspension, he applied for leave and was sanctioned 20 days leave but he failed to report on the due date.

4. During his service of above six years, the petitioner had overstayed leaves four time. A decision was taken to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner under Rule 36 of CISF Rules 2001. The petitioner was served with the following Articles of Charge:

"Charge Article No.1

    Ct.Pankaj Kumar suspended F.No.961402585, C.I.S.F. unit, B.S.P. Bhillai, was granted 20 days permission leave w.e.f. 15-11-2000 to 4-12-2000 and he was ordered to be present in unit on 5-12-2000 but he failed to comply with the order and remained unauthori

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top