SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
S.MURALIDHAR, I.S.MEHTA
Punnu – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi – Respondent


ORDER

S. Muralidhar, J.

Introduction

1. Crl. A.586/2006 by Appellant Saroj is directed against the judgment dated 17th February, 2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), New Delhi in Sessions Case No.163/2004 arising out of FIR No. 11/2003 registered at Police Station (PS) Delhi Cantonment, convicting her for the offence under Section 109 IPC read with 376(2)(g) IPC and Section 5(1)(c) of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 (ITPA) as well as the order on sentence dated 22nd February, 2006 whereby for the offence under Section 109 read with Section 376(2)(g) IPC she was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for life with a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment, to undergo RI for two months and for the offence under Section 5(1)(c) of the ITPA she was sentenced to RI for seven years with a fine of Rs.500/- and in default to undergo RI for one month.

2. The companion appeal i.e. Crl.A. 1429/2013 is by Punnu, the husband of Saroj and is directed against judgment dated 10th September, 2013 passed by the learned ASJ, Dwarka Courts in Sessions Case No.77/2013 arising out of the same FIR No.11/2003 registered at PS, Delhi Cantonment, convicting him for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top