SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
S.MURALIDHAR, VINOD GOEL
Rakesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.

1. These are two connected appeals, one by Rakesh (hereafter referred to as "the accused") and the other by Nemwati (hereafter "the victim"). The accused challenges the judgment dated 16th May 2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, North West (hereafter "the trial Court") in Sessions Case No. 50/2014 arising out of FIR No. 151/2014 registered at Police Station ("PS") Sultan Puri convicting him for the offences under Sections 326 and 342 IPC as well as the order on sentence dated 19th May 2015 whereby for the offence under Section 326 IPC, he was sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment ("RI") for five years along with fine of Rs.10,000/-, and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for one month whereas for the offence under Section 342 IPC he was sentenced to SI for one year along with fine of Rs.1,000/-, and in default of payment to undergo SI for one week. The accused was also directed to pay Rs.30,000/- as compensation to the victim under Section 357A Cr PC.

2. As far as the victim is concerned, she questions the impugned judgment in so far as the trial Court has acquitted the accused of the offence under Sec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top