DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, I.S.MEHTA
Suresh – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral)
1. Mr. Anil Dabas, Advocate seeks discharge. Since Mr. K. Paramashewar, Advocate appears on behalf of the appellant as appointed a legal aid, the power of attorney of Mr. Anil Dabas is discharged.
2. We have heard learned counsels and proceed to judgment.
3. The appellant has preferred the present appeal to assail his conviction under Section 302/34 IPC by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (NDPS), North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.68/2012 arising out of FIR No.162/2012, registered at Police Station-AmanVihar, under Sections 302/34 IPC. The appellant, upon his aforesaid conviction, has been sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.10,000/-. In default of payment of fine he has been directed to undergo further simple imprisonment for a period of one year.
4. We may observe that the co-accused Monu-being a juvenile, was tried by the JJB separately.
5. The trial Court has noticed the relevant facts relating to the incident in paragraph 2 of the impugned judgment. The same reads as follows:
"2. Facts are that accused Suresh @ Kala and deceased Narender had common ancestors. Their houses were abut
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.