SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, I.S.MEHTA
Suresh – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral)

1. Mr. Anil Dabas, Advocate seeks discharge. Since Mr. K. Paramashewar, Advocate appears on behalf of the appellant as appointed a legal aid, the power of attorney of Mr. Anil Dabas is discharged.

2. We have heard learned counsels and proceed to judgment.

3. The appellant has preferred the present appeal to assail his conviction under Section 302/34 IPC by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (NDPS), North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.68/2012 arising out of FIR No.162/2012, registered at Police Station-AmanVihar, under Sections 302/34 IPC. The appellant, upon his aforesaid conviction, has been sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.10,000/-. In default of payment of fine he has been directed to undergo further simple imprisonment for a period of one year.

4. We may observe that the co-accused Monu-being a juvenile, was tried by the JJB separately.

5. The trial Court has noticed the relevant facts relating to the incident in paragraph 2 of the impugned judgment. The same reads as follows:

    "2. Facts are that accused Suresh @ Kala and deceased Narender had common ancestors. Their houses were abut

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top