SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Kiran – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J. (Oral)--At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the prayer clause (ii) of the writ petition be read as seeking parole for the marriage of the granddaughter and for re-establishing social ties.

2. On the oral prayer, prayer (ii) of the writ petition be read as noted above.

3. On a notice being issued, a status report has been filed.

4. As noted above, the petitioner seeks parole on the ground of marriage of her granddaughter. Along with the petition, the petitioner has placed on record documents to show that the son-in-law and sons of the petitioner have passed away. Thus she has a daughter and granddaughter whose marriage is to be performed. Claim of the petitioner is that since her daughter is only there to look after the affairs of marriage of her granddaughter, her presence at the time of marriage is essential.

5. The factum of marriage of granddaughter of petitioner to be performed on 26th January, 2019 has been verified. The fact that the petitioner's son-in-law and sons have also passed away is also not in dispute.

6. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State submits that the new Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 have com

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top