Neetu Bhandari vs Deputy Commissioner of Police

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Neetu Bhandari – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Police – Respondent

Table of Content
1. factual context of the petition. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments regarding cognizable offence. (Para 2 , 10 , 11)
3. court's analysis of police investigations. (Para 12 , 13 , 19 , 21)
4. interpretation of section 324 ipc. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. final orders regarding fir and investigation. (Para 20 , 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that FIR No. 311/2018, under Sections 323 /324/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( IPC ) registered with PS Narela and all proceedings emanating therefrom, be quashed. The petitioners further pray that directions be issued to ensure the safety and security of the petitioners from anti-social elements, including respondent nos. 2 and 3. In addition, the petitioners pray that the complaint filed by them with respect to the incident, which occurred on 29.04.2018, be investigated thoroughly by the police.

2. The petitioners claim that the FIR in question does not disclose any cognizable offence and therefore the same could not be registered.

3. Briefly stated, the essential facts necessary to address the controversy in the present petition are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTVIBHU BAKHRUNeetu Bhandari – AppellantVersusDeputy Commissioner of Police – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Neetu Bhandari – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Police – Respondent