SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
YOGESH KHANNA
Ram Saran – Appellant
Versus
Kartar Singh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the partition suit (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. court's observations on evidence and legal validity (Para 8 , 9)
3. identify the binding nature of executed wills (Para 10 , 14)
4. appellant's arguments regarding procedural rights (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 15)
5. conclusion and order for appeal dismissal (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

Yogesh Khanna, J. This appeal is preferred by the appellant against an order dated 16.04.2004 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned `Trial Court') in CS No.147/06/1994 whereby the application under Order IX Rule 7 CPC filed by appellant was dismissed and also against the impugned judgment and preliminary decree dated 04.09.2008 passed by learned Trial Court in said suit.

2. Before coming to the impugned orders, let me state in brief the facts of the case.

3. The respondent No.1 had filed this suit for partition, possession and rendition of accounts with respect of the following properties:

    "(i) Constructed House No. IV/855, Bhola Nath Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi measuring 200 sq. yards;

    (ii) Constructed House No. 131, Gali Ganga Ram, Chotta Bazar, De

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top