DELHI HIGH COURT
YOGESH KHANNA
Ram Saran – Appellant
Versus
Kartar Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the partition suit (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court's observations on evidence and legal validity (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. identify the binding nature of executed wills (Para 10 , 14) |
| 4. appellant's arguments regarding procedural rights (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 15) |
| 5. conclusion and order for appeal dismissal (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT
Yogesh Khanna, J. This appeal is preferred by the appellant against an order dated 16.04.2004 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned `Trial Court') in CS No.147/06/1994 whereby the application under Order IX Rule 7 CPC filed by appellant was dismissed and also against the impugned judgment and preliminary decree dated 04.09.2008 passed by learned Trial Court in said suit.
2. Before coming to the impugned orders, let me state in brief the facts of the case.
3. The respondent No.1 had filed this suit for partition, possession and rendition of accounts with respect of the following properties:
"(i) Constructed House No. IV/855, Bhola Nath Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi measuring 200 sq. yards;
(ii) Constructed House No. 131, Gali Ganga Ram, Chotta Bazar, De
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.