Muktaben M. Mashru vs State of NCT of Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDER SHEKHAR
Muktaben M. Mashru – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent

Table of Content
1. impugned order remanded back for fresh inquiry. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. allegations of misappropriation in financial transactions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. petitioner's defense against allegations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. legal arguments regarding due process in freezing the account. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. counterarguments regarding procedure compliance. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
6. clarification of section 102 of cr.p.c. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
7. requirement for reporting seized property for legality. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
8. mandated procedures for freezing bank accounts. (Para 31 , 32 , 33)
9. court's directive on account freezing validity. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
10. final order for de-freezing under conditions. (Para 40 , 41)

JUDGMENT

Chander Shekhar, J. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 2.8.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka Court, New Delhi. (hereinafter to be referred as `impugned order') whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge has set aside the order dated 17.3.2018 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate.

2. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Dwarka Courts, vide order dated 17.3.2018 al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTCHANDER SHEKHARMuktaben M. Mashru – AppellantVersusState of NCT of Delhi – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDER SHEKHAR
Muktaben M. Mashru – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent