SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Daler Mehndi – Appellant
Versus
Sony Music Entertainment India Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. jurisdictional challenges and plaint rejection (Para 1 , 2)
2. assignment versus licensing of rights (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's authority to retain jurisdiction (Para 6 , 11)
4. demurrer in order vii rule applications (Para 8)
5. territorial jurisdiction under copyright act (Para 9 , 10)
6. case management and adjournment order (Para 12 , 18 , 19 , 21)

ORDER

I.A. 6380/2019 (under Order VII Rule 10 CPC r/w Order VII Rule 11 CPC-by defendant No.1)

1. The three prayers in the application are:

    a. To declare that this Hon'ble Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the present suit;

    b. To reject the plaint in the present Suit i.e. C.S. (Comm) No.689 of 2017 titled "Daler Mehendi v. Sony Music Entertainment India Ltd. & Ors."

    c. That the plaint in the present Suit i.e. C.S. (Comm) No.689 of 2017 titled "Daler Mehendi v. Sony Music Entertainment India Ltd. & Ors." may be returned to the Plaintiff for filing the same before the appropriate Court;

2. As regards prayer (b) is concerned case of the defendant No.1 seeking rejection of the plaint as stated by learned counsel for defendant No.1 is that the plaintiff had assigned all his rights, title and ownership in the albu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top