Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Silver Arrow Automobiles – Appellant
Versus
Laurent and Benon – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. service of summons confirmed by court. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. notice of arbitration was disputed. (Para 6) |
| 3. existence of arbitration clause determined. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. appointment of arbitrator specified. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. petition disposed of as per terms. (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)--Affidavit of service has been filed by the petitioner. The affidavit states that summons were sent to the respondent via courier. The tracking report indicates that summons were delivered at the registered address of the respondent on 02.11.2019.
2. The affidavit further states that the petitioner attempted to serve the respondent through electronic mode on 3 email-Ids. E-mail sent on amansingh@gmail.com, on 23.10.2019 did not bounce back, and is thus deemed to be served.
3. This Court finds that respondent has thus been served through courier as well as electronic mode.
4. Matter has been called twice. There is no appearance on behalf of the respondent. It appears that respondent is not interested in defending the case. The respondent is accordingly, proceeded ex parte.
5. The parties entered into an agreement dated 27.10.2016, which incorporated a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
