SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER
Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
National Testing Agency – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J.(Oral)--The substantive prayers made in the writ petition are as follows:

    "(a) declare all the options of question no. 80 in the examination UGC-NET, 2019 as wrong and direct Respondent no. 2 to setting aside the alleged correct answer key with ID No. 646350107270, by cancelling the question and awarding equal number to all the examinees accordingly;

    (b) direct Respondent no. 2 to consider the objections dated 03.07.2019 lodged by the Petitioner and redraw the result accordingly."

2. Upon notice being issued, counter-affidavits have been filed by the respondents. Concededly, the contesting respondent is respondent no.1 i.e. the National Testing Agency (N.T.A.).

3. The controversy in the present case falls in a narrow compass. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that although in terms of the leeway given by the N.T.A., he raised objections to the answers uploaded on N.T.A.'s website with regard to Question Nos.19 and 80, he obtained only partial relief.

3.1. Notably, the N.T.A., while conceding that the petitioner was right in pointing out the error in the answer-key uploaded qua Question no.19, has declined to accept the petitioner's objection vi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top