SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAJMI WAZIRI
Ramji Prashad – Appellant
Versus
Afsaf Khan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Najmi Waziri, J. (Oral)--This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 11.05.2012 passed by the learned MACT in Case No. 393/08, on the ground that it has erred in computing the award of compensation, inasmuch as after having granted Rs.15,000/- towards `special diet and conveyance charges' and Rs.15,000/- towards `pain and sufferings', only Rs.5,000/- has been added towards `special diet and conveyance charges' in the computation. The error is apparent. The same stands corrected. It shall be read as Rs.15,000/-.

2. The appellant seeks reimbursement of medical expenses. However, as noted in the impugned order, no medical bills have been brought on record to substantiate expenses incurred, therefore, no monies ought to be reimbursed in this regard.

3. On 17.09.2015, this Court had ordered as under:

    ".....

    7. Although no sufficient cause has been shown either for nonappearance on the date fixed i.e. on 20th November, 2013 when appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution and for not filing the restoration application within a reasonable time with a view to enable the appellant to have fair opportunity to seek enhancement of compensation, the delay of 307 days in filing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top