Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
S.MURALIDHAR, TALWANT SINGH
Sonu Kumar, BPM – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge termination orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. supreme court's ruling on civil posts. (Para 3 , 6 , 12) |
| 3. termination orders issued suddenly. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. observations on natural justice violations. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. authority and jurisdiction on termination. (Para 13 , 14 , 19) |
| 6. reinstatement based on precedent. (Para 16 , 20) |
| 7. court’s final order and directives. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
ORDER
S. Muralidhar, J. The Petitioners have filed the present petition challenging an order dated 30th August, 2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (`CAT') in OA No.2910 of 2015 rejecting the prayer of the Petitioners for declaring the separate orders dated 24th June, 2015 terminating their services as Gramin Dak Sewak, Branch Post Master [`GDS, BPM'] as illegal.
2. It must be mentioned here that pursuant to an advertisement issued on 5th March, 2014 by the Senior Superintendent of Post (`SSP'), Aligarh Division for filling up the substantive vacancies of GDS, BPM, the Petitioners applied and qualified in the selection. The Petitioners were included in the list of selected candidates and were issued engagement orders stating
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
