Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
National Machinery Stores – Appellant
Versus
Sushil Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to eviction order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. grounds for eviction based on necessity. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. clarifications on employment status and bona fides. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. lack of alternate accommodation evidences bona fides. (Para 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 5. court finds no triable issues. (Para 11 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. conclusion and order issued. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.(Oral)--Petitioners impugn order dated 25.04.2018 whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner has not placed on record complete copy of the eviction petition. Complete copy of the eviction petition has been handed over in Court today. Same is taken on record.
3. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent under section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 on the ground of bona fide necessity, inter-alia contending that the son of respondent No.1, Mr. Keshav Gupta is educated and has also received advanced training in Mobile Technology and wanted to open a shop for mobile repairs etc.
4. It is contended that Mr.Keshav Gupta was working as a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
