Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
State (NCT of Delhi) – Appellant
Versus
Rinku – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against acquittal in ipc offences. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. inconsistencies in prosecutrix's testimony. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. witness testimonies and their implications. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. significant changes in prosecutrix's statements. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. inconsistencies and vagueness in allegations. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. lack of corroborative evidence. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. interpretation of written communication. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 8. standard of proof and conviction. (Para 30) |
| 9. final judgment on appeal. (Para 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The present appeal has been filed by the State, impugning a judgment dated 27.07.2017 passed by the ASJ, Special Fast Track Court, Rohini Courts whereby the respondent was acquitted of the offences under Sections 376 /354D of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (IPC).
2. On 12.06.2013, the prosecutrix (name withheld to avoid any ignominy) filed a complaint alleging that the respondent (hereafter also referred as the `accused') used to follow her and had forcibly established physical relations with her at her residence by threatening her that he would show her video and defame her. It is stated
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
