MAA Tarini Industries Ltd. vs PEC Limited

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request and nature of original complaint (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments on defective notice and ambiguity (Para 5)
3. observations regarding inherent powers and procedural conduct in cases under ni act (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 19)
4. ingredients and conditions required to fulfill section 138 of ni act (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
5. dismissal of the petition due to untenable prayers (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT

Rajnish Bhatnagar J. (Oral)

CRL. M.A. 1108/2020

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 254/2020 & CRL. M.A. 1107/2020

1. The petitioners have filed the present petition u/s 482 of the Cr.P.C. with the following prayer:

(a) Call for the record of CC No. 16819 of 2017.

(b) Quash the Complaint No. 16819 of 2017 for the reasons set out in the present petition.

(c) Set aside the impugned order dated 25.10.2019 passed by the Ld. ASJ, Patiala House in Criminal Revision Case 230/2019.

(d) Set aside the order dated 19.12.2017 passed by Ld. MM-4/PHC Patiala House in CC No. 16819 of 2017.

2. The respondent herein had instituted a complaint under section 138 read with section 142 of th