Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
S.MURALIDHAR, TALWANT SINGH
Shayda Abbasi – Appellant
Versus
Registrar General, Hon'ble High Court of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appointment and resignation process of petitioner. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. conditions for deemed confirmation under 1972 rules. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. petition dismissed; no merit found. (Para 12) |
ORDER
S. Muralidhar, J. Learned counsel for the Respondent appears on advance service of notice. He waives service of formal notice.
2. Since the point involved is a short one, and involves the interpretation of the Delhi High Court Establishment (Appointments and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1972 (hereinafter, `1972 Rules'), the Court proceeds to dispose of the petition at this stage itself.
3. By a letter dated 24th December, 2010, this Court offered the Petitioner appointment to the temporary post of Judicial Translator in the pay band of Rs.9300-34800 with grade pay of Rs.4200. The first two paragraphs of the said letter read as under.
"You are hereby informed that you have been selected for appointment as temporary Judicial Translator in the pay band of Rs.9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200 plus usual allowances as admissible under the rules.
Your appointment would be governed by Delhi High Court Establishment (Appointment & Conditions of Service) Ru
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
