SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
BVSR-KVR (Joint Ventures) – Appellant
Versus
Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. facts and procedural background of the arbitration request. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
2. petitioner's arguments regarding tribunal's constitution. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
3. court’s analysis of respondent's objections and legal framework. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
4. appointment of an independent arbitrator. (Para 35)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Act", for short), with the following prayers:

    "It is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:

    (i) appoint an independent and impartial arbitrator preferably a retired judge of the High Court, as may deem fit, to adjudicate the disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent;

    (ii) Pass such other and further order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

2. The petitioner is a Joint Venture comprising of M/s BVR Constructions Pvt. Ltd. (Lead Partner) and M/s K. Venkata Raju Engineers & Contractors (Joint Partner) registered under the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top