DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Sonu – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT Govt. of Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of case details and conviction specifics. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. appellant's arguments against the trial court's judgment. (Para 7 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. examination of testimonies and evidence presented. (Para 8 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. legal definition and interpretation of 'deadly weapon'. (Para 22 , 24 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. court's dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of conviction. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The present appeal arises out of a judgement dated 31.05.2017 passed by the Learned ASJ, (North-East), Karkardooma Courts, whereby the Appellant has been convicted for the offences under Sections 397 /392/411/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ` IPC '). By an order dated 08.06.2017, the appellant has been sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 397 ; three years of rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/- for the offence under Section 392 and in default, simple imprisonment for one month; and simple imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 411 and a fine of Rs.500/- and in case of default, to undergo simple imprisonment for fifteen days. All the sentences are directed to run concurre
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.