SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Sonu – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT Govt. of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. summary of case details and conviction specifics. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. appellant's arguments against the trial court's judgment. (Para 7 , 15 , 16)
3. examination of testimonies and evidence presented. (Para 8 , 12 , 14)
4. legal definition and interpretation of 'deadly weapon'. (Para 22 , 24 , 27 , 28)
5. court's dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of conviction. (Para 30 , 31)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The present appeal arises out of a judgement dated 31.05.2017 passed by the Learned ASJ, (North-East), Karkardooma Courts, whereby the Appellant has been convicted for the offences under Sections 397 /392/411/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ` IPC '). By an order dated 08.06.2017, the appellant has been sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 397 ; three years of rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/- for the offence under Section 392 and in default, simple imprisonment for one month; and simple imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 411 and a fine of Rs.500/- and in case of default, to undergo simple imprisonment for fifteen days. All the sentences are directed to run concurre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top