Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Neha Aviation Management Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Air India Sats Airport Services Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute arises from a contract with arbitration clause. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. arguments on eligibility of the vice president to appoint an arbitrator. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 3. appointment of arbitrator contrary to supreme court judgment. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 4. termination of current arbitrator and appointment of a new one. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. decision on time-barred claims left to arbitrator. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J.(Oral)--This is a petition under Section 11(5) read with Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (`Act') seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator.
2. The parties entered into an agreement dated 15.09.2014 for outsourcing manpower ground handling services at Indira Gandhi International Airport for a period of three years w.e.f. 01.08.2014 to 31.07.2017. The said agreement contains an Arbitration Clause which reads as under:
"16.2 Any dispute or differences arising between AISATS and the Service Provider in connection with or arising out of this agreement which cannot be resolved amicably between them in accordance with the terms of this agreement shall be finally decided by reference to arbitration to be held i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
