Anant Narayan Rai vs Siddharth Rai

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Anant Narayan Rai – Appellant
Versus
Siddharth Rai – Respondent

Table of Content
1. partition of joint family properties (Para 1 , 2)
2. status of plaintiffs in huf (Para 3 , 4)
3. devolution of rights in huf property (Para 5 , 6 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. individual vs huf property rights (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 19)
5. necessary parties in suits for partition (Para 18 , 20 , 22 , 24 , 28)

JUDGMENT

1. On 25th September, 2019, the following order was passed in this suit:

"1. This suit for partition of the following Joint Family Properties:

"A. Joint Family Properties:

1. Flat at D-4, Upasana Building, Hailey Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi: 110001; At present the said flat is on rent @ over Rs.90,000/- per month.

2. Farm House (8.5 acre) bearing khasra number 7, 11, 14/1, 17/2, 18, 19, 20, 21/1, 22/1, 23/1 situated in Dera Gaon, New Delhi in the name A.B.S enterprises of which Defendant no. 1 is a sole proprietor

3. Ancestral House bearing khasra number 275,1056 measuring .4150 hectare situated at Semri Jamalpur, Mau, Uttar Pradesh of around 1 bigha; (currently occupied by plaintiff no.2 and defendant).

4. 20 Bigha agricultural ancestral land bearing khasra no. 938,1145,1144 of land measuring 2.4740 hectare situated at Semri Jamalpur, Mau, Uttar Pra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTRAJIV SAHAI ENDLAWAnant Narayan Rai – AppellantVersusSiddharth Rai – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Anant Narayan Rai – Appellant
Versus
Siddharth Rai – Respondent