SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Ranjan Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to quash the orders dated 03.08.2018 passed by the learned Special Executive Magistrate (hereinafter referred to as `SEM'), South District and the order dated 27.02.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as `ASJ'), Saket Courts, New Delhi.

2. The allegations against the petitioner in the complaint dated 29.03.2017 made by Dr. Uma Kumar/respondent No. 2, Professor and Head, Department of Rheumatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi pertain to the incident that occurred on 22.03.2017 at 4.30 PM in her office room no. 4076A & B. The whole episode started on the issue of date on minutes of faculty meeting which was mistakenly put as 16th March instead of 17th March, 2017 by the PA of respondent no. 2, who was having altercation with the office staff, when she entered the office. One Dr. Danveer Bhadu (Assistant Professor, Department of Rheumatology, AIIMS, New Delhi) was also there with the petitioner. When she inquired about the matter, the petitioner started shouting at her in front of the office chamber but she tried to pacify him but t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top