Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
J – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cancellation of bail due to threats by respondent. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. threatening messages indicate misuse of bail. (Para 5) |
| 3. criteria for cancelling bail as per supreme court. (Para 6) |
| 4. bail cancelled based on respondent's conduct. (Para 7) |
| 5. order for bail cancellation is formally issued. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT
Mukta Gupta, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.C. 2538/2019
1. Registry at the outset will show the name of the petitioner as `J' simplicitor.
2. Respondent No. 2 was granted bail in case FIR No. 288/2018 under Section 376/313 IPC registered at P.S. Nihal Vihar.
3. By this petition, the petitioner seeks cancellation of bail of respondent No. 2 on the ground that after the grant of bail, respondent No. 2 has been abusing the concession of the grant of bail to him.
4. The petitioner lodged FIR No. 288/2018 at P.S. Nihal Vihar against respondent No. 2 for the offence punishable under Section 376/313 IPC. Respondent No. 2 applied for regular bail before this Court which was granted vide order dated 31st July, 2018, on the nature of allegations and also because of the fact that it had been two months while the respondent No. 2 was in custody. The respondent No. 2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
