SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
Indrawati – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, J. Present appeals arise out of a common FIR bearing No. 134/2004. With the consent of the parties both these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by the present Judgment.

2. Criminal Appeal No. 1223/2019 was filed by the Appellant against the judgment dated 05.05.2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi whereby the accused persons namely Satinder, Vikas and Vinod/respondent Nos.2 to 4 were acquitted (accused/respondent No.5 Diwakar @ Sudhakar was declared Proclaimed Offender) in Sessions case No. 134/2004 arising out of FIR No.134/2004, under Sections 365 /364A/302/120A/120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (hereinafter referred to as `IPC') and the accused Satinder was also acquitted under Section 25 ARMS ACT registered at Police Station Badarpur, New Delhi.

3. Criminal Appeal No. 1222/2019 was filed the Appellant against the judgment dated 31.05.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi whereby the Respondent No. 2 namely Diwakar @ Sudhakar was acquitted in Sessions case No. 60/2012 arising out of FIR No.134/2004, under Sections 365 /364A/302/120B/34 of the IPC registered at Police St


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top