CDE Asia Limited vs Jaideep Shekhar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
CDE Asia Limited – Appellant
Versus
Jaideep Shekhar – Respondent

Table of Content
1. establishment of plaintiff's inventions and patents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. defendant's arguments regarding patent validity and jurisdiction. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's reasoning on patent rights and territorial jurisdiction. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. dismissal of the application by the court. (Para 17)

JUDGMENT

IA 4830/2019 (filed by the defendant No. 2 under Order VII Rule 10 & 11 CPC)

1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit, inter alia, praying for a decree of permanent injunction against the defendant, their directors, servants, agents, licensee, distributors, etc. restraining them from making, manufacturing, using, offering for sale, selling and/or importing the impugned product "FM 120 CONEXUS" or any other product which is covered by the subject patent No. 307249 in India causing infringement of the plaintiff's patent No. 307249 in short IN `249, as also restraining the defendants from selling, making, offering for sale, importing "FM 120 CONEXUS" or any product having the similar design as the plaintiff's registered design 262629 amounting to infringement of the plaintiff's registered design or passing the products of the defendan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMUKTA GUPTACDE Asia Limited – AppellantVersusJaideep Shekhar – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
CDE Asia Limited – Appellant
Versus
Jaideep Shekhar – Respondent