Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
A.K.CHAWLA
Dhananjay Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Airports Authority of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consideration of common questions of law and fact. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. evaluation of experience and eligibility criteria. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. contentions by aai and petitioners regarding eligibility. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. examination of the term 'executive cadre'. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. interpretation of aai's hiring regulations. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. assessment of the impact of contractual work experience. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. discussion on the equal treatment of candidates. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. judgment conclusion regarding eligibility and regulations. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
A.K. Chawla, J. All the four writ petitions viz. W.P.(C) 9687/2019, 9716/2019, 10697/2019 and 12124/2019 are taken up together as these invite consideration on common questions of facts and law. For the sake of brevity, the petitioners in W.P.(C) 9687/2019 shall be referred to as 'Dhananjay & Ors', and, the petitioners in the three other petitions shall be referred to as 'Arvind', 'Anand' and `Jayalakshmi', respectively.
2. The petitioners are aggrieved of the fact that on the on-line applications made by them for being appointed to the post of Manager
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
