SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, SANJEEV NARULA
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal regarding depreciation claims. (Para 1 , 2)
2. issues remanded to the ao. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 9644/2000

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

CM APPLs. 9645/2020

Keeping in view the averments in the application, the delay in re-filing the present appeal is condoned.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

ITA 195/2020

1. Present appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 challenging the order dated 25th March, 2019 passed by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short `ITAT') in ITA No. 6227/DEL/2018 for the Assessment Year 2006-07.

2. In similar appeals being ITA Nos. 2/2020 and 3/2020 filed by the revenue/appellant challenging the same impugned order 25th March, 2019 passed by the ITAT pertaining to the same Assessee for the Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2007-08, a coordinate Bench of this Court of which one of us (HMJ Sanjeev Narula) was a party, has held as under:

    "6. The following substantial question of law arises for our consideration:

    a. Whether the Tribunal, while finding that the Assessing Officer had gone beyond the remand order dated 05.10.2015 and on that account setting

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top