SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Hunny Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Ved Prakash Sharma – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. A suit for partition of property ad-measuring 200 sq. yds. in Arjun Nagar, Kotla Mubarakpur, Opp. Defence Colony, New Delhi (hereinafter `suit premises') was filed by Mr. Ved Prakash Sharma (hereinafter `Plaintiff') against the family members of his two brothers - Mr. R.P. Sharma and Mr. O.P. Sharma. In the said suit, Defendant Nos.1 and 2 represent the family of Mr. R.P. Sharma and Defendant No.3 is the widow of Mr. O.P. Sharma.

2. The case of the Plaintiff is that he along with his brother i.e. Mr. O.P. Sharma and the wife of the second brother - Mrs. Raj Rani Sharma purchased the suit premises. Each of the brothers/their family owned 1/3rd share. Despite repeated requests, the Defendants did not agree for partition. Hence the suit for partition.

3. In the written statement, Defendant No.3 - Mrs. Puran Laxmi Sharma - wife of Mr. O.P. Sharma, primarily pleaded non-joinder of necessary parties. She took the stand that she is residing in a portion of the suit premises which is less than her 1/3rd share in the property. Finally, it was averred that physical division of the property is not possible by metes and bounds.

4. The family of Mr. R.P. Sha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top