Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
G.S.SISTANI, ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Sushil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. impleadment of co-petitioners permitted. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. facts regarding employment and orders discussed. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. petitioners argue for direct employment by government. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. court analyzes cabinet decision on wage payments. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. writ petitions disposed; compliance with cabinet decision enforced. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT
G.S. Sistani, J. (Oral)
C.M.4825/2020 (impleadment) in W.P.(C) 842/2020
1. The present application has been filed by the applicants seeking their impleadment as co-petitioners in the present writ petition.
2. The prayer made in the application is allowed. The applicants are impleaded as co-petitioners in W.P.(C) 842/2020. The Amended Memo of Parties be taken on record.
3. The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 842/2020, W.P.(C) 876/2020, W.P.(C) 877/2020, W.P.(C) 878/2020 & W.P.(C) 883/2020
4. With consent of the parties all five writ petitions are set down for final hearing and disposal by this common order at the admission stage itself.
5. The undisputed facts are that the petitioners were working in the dispensaries run by the Delhi Government as sweeper-cum-cho
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
