SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Sarwan Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Ranjana Sharma – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background of the maintenance petition and family dynamics. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding the wife's ability to earn and entitlement to maintenance. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court observations on income and maintenance calculations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. modification of maintenance based on income distribution. (Para 9)
5. final conclusion on the maintenance issue and orders. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

1. The present petition is directed against the order dated 16.03.2018 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court (Distt. Shahadara), Karkardooma Court, Delhi in CC No. 22/2017 whereby the respondent no.1/wife and respondent no.2/the minor son, Master Lowish were granted interim maintenance @ Rs.12,000/- p.m. and Rs.8,000/- p.m. respectively from the date of filing of the petition till further orders.

2. The respondents had filed the aforesaid petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance. It was stated that the marriage of respondent no.1 was solemnized with the petitioner on 22.06.2004 in Delhi. Out of the wedlock, respondent no.2 i.e., Master Lowish was born on 08.10.2006, who has been living with his mother/respondent no.1. It was stated that respondent no.1/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top