SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Prem Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual basis of charge framing (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments on charge alterations (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's observations on charge alterations (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. conclusion and dismissal of petition (Para 9)

JUDGMENT

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 01.09.2014 passed by the learned Trial Court by virtue of which charges against the respondents were framed under Sections 308/323/34 IPC.

2. In brief the case of the prosecution is that on 21.11.2013 petitioner was standing outside his house and all of a sudden respondent no. 2 tried to tie his buffalo outside the house of the petitioner to which he objected. On this, respondent no. 2 started abusing him and used bad slays. It is alleged that in the mean time, petitioner started calling his family members and respondent no. 2 also called his family members. In the meanwhile, respondent nos. 3 and 4 reached there. It is alleged that respondent no. 3 was having spade (faavra) in his hand and respondent no. 4 was carrying a stick (danda) in his hand and they both started quarreling with the petitioner. When the petitioner tried to defend himself

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top