SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, C.HARI SHANKAR
Ashok Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
National Law University Delhi – Respondent


ORDER

D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)--This so-called Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been preferred with the following prayers:

    "1. To issue a Writ of Quo Warranto or the appropriate Writ directing the Respondent No. 2 to vacate the office of the Registrar, NLUD.

    2. To issue a Writ of Quo Warranto or the appropriate Writ thereby quashing the illegal appointment of Respondent No. 2 as Professor w.e.f. 2011-12 & further regularised in November, 2013 at the NLUD.

    3. To issue a Writ of Quo Warranto or the appropriate Writ directing the Respondent No.3 to show-cause by what authority he appointed Respondent No. 2 as the Professor and later the Registrar of NLUD;

    4. To issue a Writ of Prohibition or the appropriate Writ directing the Respondent No. 4 to stop using the degree of LL.M. for any purpose whatsoever and in any manner howsoever from the date of issue of such writ;

    5. To issue an appropriate Writ to cancel the admission of Respondent No.4 to 2019 Batch of the Ph.D degree course of the University.

    6. To issue a Writ Mandamus directing the University to take disciplinary actions against the Respondent No. 2 and 3 for blatant abuse of powers;

    7. To issue a Writ of Quo Warran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top