DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Ramesh Arya – Appellant
Versus
Pawan Arya – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit for partition of property No.A-135, Priyadarshini Vihar, New Delhi, pleading that (i) Sh. Paramanand Arya, being the father of the plaintiff, defendants no.1,2 and 7 and of Shiv Kumar Arya, another brother of the plaintiff and defendants no.1,2 and 7 was the owner of the said property constructed over land ad-measuring 360 sq. yds.; (ii) Shiv Kumar Arya has died leaving the defendants no.3 to 6 as his widow, sons and daughter respectively; (iii) Sh. Parmanand Arya has left a validly executed registered Will dated 8th September, 2005 bequeathing the entire property in favour of his five children; and, (iv) thus the plaintiff, defendants no.1,2 and 7, each have a 1/5th undivided share in the property and the defendants no.3 to 6 together have remaining 1/5th share in the property.
2. The suit was entertained and vide ex parte ad-interim order dated 14th November, 2018, which continues to be in force, the parties restrained from alienating, encumbering or parting with possession of, or any part of, property No.A-135, Priyadarshini Vihar, New Delhi.
3. One joint written statement has been filed by defendants no.1,2,6 and 7 and an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.