DELHI HIGH COURT
JAYANT NATH
Kusum Bhatt – Appellant
Versus
Central Information Commissioner – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jayant Nath, J. (Oral)--This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the order dated 04.06.2014 passed by respondent No.1/Central Information Commission whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed and the information sought was denied.
2. The case of the petitioner is that one Sh. Prakash Nautiyal has filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 against the petitioner which is said to be pending in the District Court in Kanpur. In the said complaint Sh.Prakash Nautiyal has sought recovery of money from the petitioner stating that a loan of Rs.15 lakhs in cash was advanced by Sh.Nautiyal to the petitioner. Based on this, a complaint was filed by the petitioner to respondent No. 3 about the tax evasion by Mr.Prakash Nautiyal. Subsequently, another letter dated 10.06.2011 was also sent to the respondent stating that Mr.Prakash Nautiyal in his statement before the said court has stated on oath that he had given a loan of Rs.15 lakhs to the petitioner along with another loan of Rs.75 lakhs. Based on the above, the petitioner filed an RTI Application dated 26.06.2013 where he sought the following:
"i) Whether the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.