SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
China Railway No.10 Engineering Group Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
National Highways Authority of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 10698/2020 in W.P.(C) 3076/2020 & CM APPL. 10704/2020 in WPC 3079/2020

The court fees be paid within two weeks. The applications stand disposed of.

W.P.(C) 3076/2020& CM APPL. 10697/2020 AND W.P.(C) 3079/2020 & CM APPL. 10703/2020

1. Since the parties to the present petitions and, the facts relevant for the decision of two writ petitions are the same, and the petitioner as well as the respondents have advanced the same set of submissions, we proceed to dispose of these two writ petitions by this common order. These two writ petitions have been preferred by the petitioner M/s. China Railway No.10 Engineering Group Co. Ltd. seeking similar reliefs, namely, to assail the two similar letters dated 20.03.2020 issued by the respondent/National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to the petitioner, declaring the petitioner's two technical bids in respect of two different bids submitted by the petitioner in response to two Requests for Proposal (RFPs) issued by the respondent for construction of portions of a highway, to be non-responsive. The particulars of the two RFPs find mention in the "Subject" of the two impugned communications.

2. The co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top