Aditya Kumar Bhandari vs Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Aditya Kumar Bhandari – Appellant
Versus
Serious Fraud Investigation Office – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petition for bail filed. (Para 1 , 2)
2. sfio's allegations and defense arguments. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 11 , 12)
3. historical context of the case and disputes. (Para 7 , 9 , 10)
4. judgment regarding lack of evidence. (Para 22 , 24 , 39 , 40 , 46)
5. bail allowed based on provided considerations. (Para 52 , 54)

JUDGMENT

1. The present petition is filed seeking the indulgence of this Court for enlargement of the petitioner on bail in Reg. No.CC/149/2020.

2. The case of petitioner is that RHL was established on 04.08.2004. The eldest brother of Srivastava Family namely, Late Rajesh Srivastava was the 'Founder Chairman and Managing Director' of Rockland Hospitals Limited (hereinafter referred to as `RHL') and was solely managing the day-to-day affairs of RHL till the date of his demise i.e. 25.01.2016 and thereafter the same were handled by his younger brother namely Prabhat Kumar Srivastava till 30.06.2016. The Rockland Group was managed by Late Rajesh Srivastava and his family. The petitioner was a close friend of Srivastavas and was given employment by Late Rajesh Srivastava on this account. After 30.06.2016, RHL was taken over by VPS Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. and on the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSURESH KUMAR KAITAditya Kumar Bhandari – AppellantVersusSerious Fraud Investigation Office – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Aditya Kumar Bhandari – Appellant
Versus
Serious Fraud Investigation Office – Respondent