Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, C.HARI SHANKAR
Sflc.in – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. public interest litigation prayers (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's grievances against executive direction (Para 2 , 6) |
| 3. temporary halt of telecommunication services (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. reasons for dismissal of writ petition (Para 5 , 7) |
| 5. conclusion and dismissal of the case (Para 8) |
ORDER
D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)
CM Nos. 55625-55626/2019 (exemptions)
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
The applications are disposed of.
W.P.(C) 13853/2019
1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers:
"a. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari setting aside the directions contained in the Communication dated 18.12.2019 issued by Respondent No. 3 bearing No. No. 876 SO/DCP/Special Cell and any Communication halting the services thereafter;
b. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus to the Respondent No. 3 not to issue any order suspending telecommunication services as the Respondent No. 3 does not have the authority to issue such orders; and
c. Issue an order declaring that only the competent personnel as authorised by the Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Safety) Rules, 2017 shall issue orders to suspend tele
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
