SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Directorate of Enforcement – Appellant
Versus
Rajiv Saxena – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. An interesting issue, involving the interplay between Section 306 , and Section 308 , of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "the Cr PC", or "the 1973 Cr PC"), arises for consideration in the present case.

Facts, and the impugned Order

2. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) registered RC No. 217-2013A-0003, against the respondent, on 12th March, 2013, alleging commission of offences, by him, punishable under Section 420, read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Sections 7, 8, 9, 12 and 13(1)(d), read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Inasmuch as the allegations, against the respondent (and others arraigned with him) indicated commission of offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "the PMLA"), ECIR No. 15/DLZO/2014 was also registered against, inter alia, the respondent, on 3rd July, 2014, by the Directorate of Enforcement (the petitioner herein).

3. Given the limited controversy before me, which is purely legal in nature and turns on the interpretation of Sections 306 and 308 of the Cr PC, it is not necessary to allude, to the allegatio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top