SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Lalit Kumar Jain – Respondent


JUDGMENT

I.A. 4155/2020 (under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC-by defendant Nos.1 and 3)

1. The hearing has been conducted through Video Conferencing.

2. By the present application filed by defendant Nos.1 and 3 in the representative capacity on behalf of defendant No.4, the following prayers are made:

    (a) grant a mandatory injunction and pass such necessary orders and directions against the Plaintiffs to enable Defendant No. 4 to undertake its business and affairs, including by raising finances to meet the deposit amount of Rs.4,00,00,000/- (Rupees Four Crores) in terms of the SC Order by creating an appropriate security in respect of such number of the Unsold Units in Towers C1 and C2 in Defendant No. 4's Project and/or by creating a hypothecation on the future receivables of sold units in Towers C1 and C2 in Defendant No. 4's Project as detailed in Paragraph 65 above without the requirement of any consent from the Plaintiffs in that regard ;

    (b) grant a mandatory injunction and pass such necessary orders and directions against Plaintiff No.2 to enable Defendant No. 4 to undertake its business and affairs including by raising finance for re-commencing and completing the developm







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top