Dhiren Kumar Mohanty vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, ASHA MENON
Dhiren Kumar Mohanty – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. details of the petitioner's appointment and medical condition. (Para 3 , 4)
2. court's observation on the conduct and claims of the petitioner. (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. discussion on delay and potential rights. (Para 6 , 9 , 10)
4. principles of delay and stale claims in promotions. (Para 16 , 19 , 20)
5. reaffirmation of the established seniority rights. (Para 21 , 23)
6. rejection of the petition based on delay and effect on third parties. (Para 24)

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.

CM No.12275/2020 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptionsand as per relevant rules.

2. The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.3461/2020

3. This petition, which has come up today for the first time for admission, seeks, (i) issuance of a writ of certiorari to the respondents Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) for quashing the orders dated 10th June, 2016, 21st May, 2019 and 1st June, 2019 whereby the respondents rejected the representations dated 8th January, 2016 and 10th May, 2019 of the petitioner; and, (ii) issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to apply Paras 4.16 and 4.17 of the Standing Order No.04/2008

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTRAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, ASHA MENONDhiren Kumar Mohanty – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, ASHA MENON
Dhiren Kumar Mohanty – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent