Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
HIMA KOHLI, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Jitendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Securitrans India Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed against dismissal of writ petition (Para 1) |
| 2. grounds for dismissal of writ petition outlined (Para 2) |
| 3. contested view on company’s status as state (Para 3 , 10) |
| 4. tests to determine state authority (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 5. public function definition and application (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. referral to other forums for relief (Para 9 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. appeal dismissed; no intervention needed (Para 14) |
ORDER
HEARD THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING
1. The appellants/petitioners are aggrieved by the judgment dated 20th May, 2020 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing a writ petition filed by them praying inter alia for issuance of a writ/direction to the respondent/company, where they were employed, not to terminate their services and further, to release all arrears of wages.
2. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants/petitioners on the ground that the same does not lie under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The learned Single Judge has held that the respondent/company is a private company and is not a State or any other Authority and nor is it funded by the Government. The claim of the appellants/p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
