SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
GE Power India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
NHPC Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff's copyright ownership and contract details (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. alleged infringement of copyright by defendant (Para 6 , 7)
3. jurisdictional objections raised by the defendant (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14)
4. defendant's claim of license under the contract nuances (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. court's scrutiny of jurisdiction arising from copyright infringement (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
6. scope of nclt jurisdiction under the ibc (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 34)
7. court's final ruling on maintainability of the suit (Para 37 , 38)

ORDER

1. The hearing has been conducted through Video Conferencing.

2. As per the plaint, the plaintiff company which was initially known as Asea Brown Boveri Management Limited underwent a name change to Alstom Projects India Ltd. on 11th November, 2002. Subsequent thereto on 6th June, 2012 the plaintiff's name was changed to Alstom India Ltd. and pursuant to a global acquisition of Alstom India Ltd. by General Electric Company on 5th August, 2016 the plaintiff underwent another name change to GE Power India Ltd., i.e. the plaintiff herein.

3. The plaintiff's predecessor, that is, Alstom India Ltd. (earlier known as Alstom Projects India Ltd.)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top