SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
S.RAVINDRA BHAT, VINOD GOEL
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Aeren R Infrstructure Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.(Open Court)--Revenue's appeals in these two cases question an order of the ITAT. The issue concerns the treatment of damages and compensation awarded to the assessee. The Assessment Officer (AO) rejected the assessee's claim that these were towards capital receipts and ruled that they have fallen in the revenue stream. The CIT(A) rejected the assessee's appeal.

2. The facts are that the assessee engages itself in the business of real estate and had entered into a consortium agreement with its associates which defines the role, rights and responsibilities. This consortium entered into an agreement to sell with one JMA Buildcom Private Limited for purchase of 10 acres of land for a consideration of Rs.15 crores. The seller JMA Buildcom defaulted in its commitment within the prescribed and extended time limit. Ultimately, upon parties resorting to the Dispute Settlement Arbitration; a settlement was arrived at and an award was made based upon the parties' eventual settlement. The amount received by the assessee as a part of its entitlement (as consortium) was credited in its books of accounts as a capital stream. The AO and the CIT(A) held that the amou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top