Rohit vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Rohit – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Table of Content
1. appeal challenging conviction and sentencing. (Para 1)
2. details of the incident as per victim's complaint. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. arguments regarding evidence and witness credibility. (Para 5 , 6)
4. assessment of victim's testimony. (Para 7 , 20)
5. credibility of child victim's evidence examined. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
6. medical evidence in child rape cases analyzed. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
7. conclusion affirming victim's credibility and conviction. (Para 28)
8. final statements on dismissal of appeal. (Para 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT

1. The present appeal is preferred under Section 374 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant Rohit challenging the judgment on conviction dated 12.02.2020 and order on sentence dated 15.02.2020 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO Act) (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, in SC No. 28233/2016 arising out of FIR No. 616/2015 under Sections 376 IPC & 6 of POCSO Act registered at Police Station I.P. Estate whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 6 of POCSO Act and under Section 376 IPC. Further, vide order on sentence dated 15.02.2020, the appellant was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 15 years for the offence punis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMANOJ KUMAR OHRIRohit – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Rohit – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent